Russian drone shot down in Ukraine, April 2022 Mvs.gov.ua, CC BY 4.0
Addressing the Way forward for Fight: Overcoming Interoperability, Functionality Gaps, and Countermeasures in Drone Warfare
Throughout an in depth briefing on Could 13, 2024, titled “Drone Warfare: NATO, Ukraine, Israel, and the Crimson Sea,” hosted by the Middle for European Coverage Evaluation (CEPA), main protection consultants gathered to debate the crucial challenges of integrating drones into fashionable navy operations. Federico Borsari, Lance Landrum, Sarah Krajewski, Joanne van der Merwe, and Gordon B. “Skip” Davis, Jr. shared their insights on how technological developments, notably drones, are reshaping warfare.
Federico Borsari opened the session by figuring out three major challenges confronted by navy organizations when integrating drones: interoperability, functionality gaps, and counter-UAS methods. These themes framed the discussions, emphasizing the advanced dynamics of adopting drone expertise in a transatlantic protection context.
1. Interoperability: Gordon B. “Skip” Davis, Jr. detailed the difficulties in reaching interoperability amongst NATO allies, noting the varied programs and requirements in use. “Interoperability is arguably the largest problem in the mean time,” Davis acknowledged, explaining how this challenge complicates collaborative efforts in knowledge trade and operational coordination throughout completely different navy platforms.
2. Functionality Gaps: The panel mentioned the potential gaps that many NATO nations face, notably in strong drone applied sciences. Lance Landrum underscored the significance of addressing these gaps to keep up operational effectiveness. “Many NATO nations are lagging when it comes to strong drone capabilities, not simply within the air, but in addition in different domains which can be changing into an increasing number of crucial,” he remarked, highlighting the pressing want for technological upgrades and enhancements.
3. Counter-UAS Methods: The need for efficient countermeasures towards hostile drones was one other key level of debate. Federico Borsari elaborated on the necessity for complete protection methods that embody each materials and non-material components. “Regardless of elevated focus and sources, many NATO nations are usually not well-positioned to counter what’s changing into a really vicious and purposeful risk coming from drones,” he noticed, indicating a major space of concern for navy planners.
All through the briefing, the consultants agreed that whereas drones supply quite a few tactical benefits, their efficient integration requires overcoming important strategic challenges. These embody creating interoperable programs, filling functionality gaps, and enhancing counter-UAS measures.
This CEPA briefing not solely make clear the urgent points surrounding drone warfare but in addition set the stage for future discussions on how greatest to combine these superior applied sciences into cohesive and efficient navy methods.
Learn extra: