Pricey Director Easterly and Principal Deputy Below Secretary Passarelli:
We write to request that you simply declassify sure data regarding potential nationwide safety dangers posed by unmanned plane methods (UAS or “drones”) which have been produced, manufactured, or assembled within the Folks’s Republic of China (PRC), together with these made by Da Jiang Improvements (DJI) or Autel Robotics (Autel). It has come to our consideration that there are findings from Sandia Nationwide Laboratories (SNL) pertaining to nationwide safety dangers related to drones which have been produced, manufactured, or assembled within the PRC.
Moreover, on January 17, 2024, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company (CISA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issued a joint advisory elevating consciousness of the numerous dangers posed by PRC-made drones to our nation’s important infrastructure and U.S. nationwide safety. Alarmingly, the advisory states that, “”the usage of Chinese language-manufactured UAS in important infrastructure operations dangers exposing delicate data to PRC authorities, jeopardizing U.S. nationwide safety, financial safety, and public well being and security.” The findings of CISA’s and the FBI’s evaluation have been apparently regarding sufficient to warrant the publication and dissemination of this advisory to state, native, tribal, and territorial companions.
It’s our understanding that the SNL’s evaluation doesn’t implicate any delicate intelligence sources or strategies that will in any other case warning towards declassification. In any case, there are particular procedures in place for declassifying data—whereas safeguarding delicate intelligence sources and strategies—when protecting data labeled is outweighed by the general public curiosity,4 as is the case right here. We due to this fact ask that the related Government Department departments or businesses, together with CISA and the Division of Vitality (DOE), declassify these and all associated findings instantly in order that lawmakers and the American public can absolutely perceive the threats posed by drones which have been produced, manufactured, or assembled within the PRC, together with these made by DJI and Autel.
DJI and Autel are UAS know-how corporations headquartered in Shenzhen, China, that management practically 90 p.c of the worldwide UAS market. DJI drones, particularly, are well-known for his or her high quality, affordability, and superior options, making them a well-liked selection for American hobbyists, companies, in addition to State, native, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) legislation enforcement businesses. Lately, DJI has obtained essentially the most consideration from Congress given the corporate’s dominant market share. Nevertheless, Autel’s rising footprint in the US is equally alarming.
DJI and Autel’s business relationship with 1000’s of SLTT legislation enforcement businesses in the US provides a layer of complexity to this subject. The widespread adoption of PRC drones by SLTT legislation enforcement businesses might inadvertently expose them to cybersecurity dangers that aren’t effectively understood, whereas concurrently undermining our nationwide safety. A number of federal businesses have warned towards or banned the procurement of sure UAS originating within the PRC, as a result of dangers they pose.7 Nevertheless, the main points of those UAS threats stay labeled.
For instance, in August 2017, Homeland Safety Investigations (HSI) —the investigative element of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement—issued an alert warning that DJI drones are “[l]ikely offering U.S. important infrastructure and legislation enforcement knowledge to [the] Chinese language authorities.” This bulletin “assesse[d] with excessive confidence [DJI] is selectively concentrating on authorities and privately owned entities inside [infrastructure and law Cong. R. Serv. (IFI2183), Procedures for Declassifying Intelligence of Public Interest (August 10, 2023), enforcement sectors] to increase its potential to gather and exploit delicate U.S. knowledge.” Additional, the bulletin warned that DJI-established functions, when used with their UAS {hardware}, acquire GPS areas and pictures taken by the machine, register facial recognition knowledge even when
the system is off, and add data to cloud storage positioned in Taiwan and Hong Kong, to
which our foremost adversary, the Chinese language Communist Social gathering, virtually actually has entry.10 The
bulletin additional states {that a} “overseas authorities with entry to this data might simply
coordinate bodily or cyber assaults towards important websites.”
Concurrently, in August 2017, the Division of the Military launched a memorandum ordering a grounding on the usage of DJI functions and merchandise, citing an “elevated consciousness of cyber vulnerabilities related to DJI merchandise.”12 The next yr, in Could 2018, the Division of Protection (DoD) halted all procurement of commercial-off-the-shelf drones.
Could 2019, CISA issued an an identical warning that Chinese language-made drones pose a “potential threat of
a company’s data.”14 Additional, in January 2020, following a evaluation of its drone fleet,
the Inside Division quickly retired non-emergency drones. In keeping with then Secretary of the Inside Bernhardt’s order, “data collected throughout UAS missions has the potential to be precious to overseas entities, organizations, and governments.”
In December 2020, the Division of Commerce added DJI to its Entity Listing, which prohibits U.S.-based companies from exporting know-how to corporations designated as a nationwide safety concern. In July 2021, DoD reiterated its place Da Jiang Improvements pose potential threats to nationwide safety.”18 Later, in December 2021, the Treasury Division added DJI to its Chinese language-Army Industrial Advanced checklist over reviews that its UAS are utilized by Xinjiang Public Sector Bureau to surveil China’s Uyghur Muslim
inhabitants.
In gentle of those important points, there’s a sturdy public curiosity in understanding the threats posed by PRC-manufactured drones. As a number of federal businesses and departments have taken appreciable motion primarily based on labeled data, it’s effectively previous time that Congress, SLTT legislation enforcement businesses, and the American public obtain solutions to questions regarding PRC drones which have remained excellent for a number of years.
Moreover, we request that CISA and DOE present Committee employees with a briefing
about this request no later than July 2, 2024.
Thanks on your consideration to this necessary matter.
Sincerely,
Mark E. Inexperienced, MD
Cathy McMorris Rodgers
Chairman Chair
Committee on Homeland Safety Committee on Vitality and Commerce